Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zona

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Zona was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was

Zona[edit]

  • Some kind of Pokemon fancruft related to Pokemorphs above. Delete Gazpacho 06:10, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Um... yeah... talk about rather obscure. Delete Mo0 06:11, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • See comments on VFD/Kiki Komodo and delete. —No-One Jones (m) 06:16, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Fanfic community. --Improv 06:50, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Fanfic. Ian Pugh 07:14, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete Krupo 07:22, Nov 2, 2004 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect to Pokemorphs in order to centralize all the related articles on Pokemorphs. Why is it necessary to VFD an article within only a few hours of this page's existence? Refer to a subject matter group, such as Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon, and wait to see if the article can be cleaned-up. -- Netoholic @ 08:26, 2004 Nov 2 (UTC)
    • There are two reasons something may not be encyclopedic. Topic, and content. Judgements on a topic can be made, suggesting that they are not encyclopedic, and in such cases, the youth of the actual article content is irrelevant. That's what happened here. --Improv 18:02, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
      • I am no expert on Pokemon, or many subjects. Neither are you. Making judgements based on a Google search and 30 seconds of checking does not exclude this information. Refer these sorts of things to those users here that have identified themselves as subject matter experts. When they have made an assessment, and made some effort trying to clean it up, then I will accept that we've given this sufficient investigation. -- Netoholic @ 18:32, 2004 Nov 2 (UTC)
        • There is a difference between material that is core to the game, and material that goes on a tangent from anything previously mentioned in either the cartoon series, the video games, or any of their related material. While I'm not completely a Pokemon expert, I do realize that enough of the things written about these characters has little, if anything, to do with anything Pokemon-related release by Nintendo. The page that this article deals with, Pokemorphs, admits that it's fanfiction. A small fanfiction article that combines three completely different genres (arguably) is not the same as a published book by Nintendo (which, based on the material being covered, would probably never happen.) Mo0 20:49, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
        • Netoholic, I may not have mentioned it here before, but I actually really like pokemon. I've beaten red, green, and yellow, have played silver, have all of them plus the first stadium game, and enjoyed the anime, having a *lot* of them on tape. I also saw the first three movies. I haven't dusted them off for awhile, and may not be up to date with the latest things, but I actually am not at all ignorant of Pokemon. That doesn't mean I think it's encyclopedic. Please try not to assume knowledge of what people know without evidence. Oh, and to the rest of you, no, I'm not the only adult in the world who likes Pokemon. :) --Improv 20:16, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
          • I've heard of this. It's fan fiction. I used to be an operator in the #pokemorphs IRC channel - it's fan fiction, I tell you! Andre (talk) 23:42, Nov 7, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Pokemon fanfic disguised as an article. Gwalla | Talk 22:29, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Jayjg 03:25, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete [[User:BrokenSegue|BrokenSegue]] 03:50, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete fanficcruft. —tregoweth 04:26, Nov 5, 2004 (UTC)
  • Merge with Pokemorph. --L33tminion | (talk) 21:42, Nov 5, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, or, if you prefer, merge and redirect to Pokemorph, then delete Pokemorph. -R. fiend 06:45, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Andre (talk) 23:42, Nov 7, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.