Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WP1 0 Icon.svg
Wikipedia 1.0 — (talk)
FAQTo do
Release version tools
Guide(talk)(stats)
Article selection process
(talk)
Version 0.8 bot selection
Version 0.8 feedback
IRC channel (IRC)

Release criteria
Review team (FAQ)
Version 0.8 release
(manual selection) (t)
"Selection" project (Talk)

schools selection
Offline WP for Indian Schools


CORE TOPICS
CORE SUPPLEMENT
Core topics - 1,000
(Talk) (COTF) (bot)
TORRENT (Talk)
"Selection" project for kids ((t))
WORK VIA WIKI
PROJECTS
(talk)
Pushing to 1.0 (talk)

Static content subcom.

If you are new to this page, please see the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/FAQs.

Core topics discussionsWiki sort discussionsFAs first discussionsWork via WikiProjects discussionsPushing to 1.0 discussions

Archives[edit]

          A Wikipedia ad has been created for this project page. Click [show] to view it.

Is this project inactive?[edit]

Looking at the project page listing the last release at over a decade ago. Some sort of overhaul of the content would be good to give folks an idea of where this is up to would be good...@Walkerma:? cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:39, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

No! The project has changed, and we don't really produce specific collections in the same way - we work to guide and support offline work, and to connect end users with the technical people; that's much harder to write up on a page than the "Version X" collections that we used to put together. I'm aware that I haven't updated the page much since our Hackathon in 2017. Unfortunately, I haven't had the time to spend a day rewriting the page to reflect the new situation properly, or even to do my part to help support the coders. Right now, there's a lot of work going on (not by me!) rewriting the bot, and there is regular contact between active participants (2-3 times per month), and almost daily emails. Walkerma (talk) 02:24, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Maybe the project should be rebranded and the 1.0 project shutdown? Jason Quinn (talk) 11:29, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Printworthy settings of a template are wrong[edit]

{{R from city and state}} marks all those redirects as printworthy but I don't think that's accurate: lots of cities are only in one state or it would be trivial to find the city entry you're looking for in a print edition. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 15:13, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

This probably applies to all the templates that feed Category:Redirects from more specific geographic names. I see that {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}}, which is unprintworthy, gives Paris, France as an example of an unnecessary comma-separated qualifier.
I first noticed this issue when fixing a printability conflict on Los Angeles, California. I noticed the same on Boston, Massachusetts but haven't fixed it there yet.
I suppose it would be best for the aforementioned templates to default to unprintworthy but accept a parameter for overriding this. --SoledadKabocha (talk) 19:33, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Another example is {{R from ambiguous sort name}}, which is {{printworthy}} with no way of making it {{unprintworthy}}. Thus for example Taylor, Dean redirects to DAB page Dean Taylor, which is correctly DEFAULTSORTed as "Taylor, Dean". This means that in print there will be two identical entries, one a redirect and the other the DAB page which it targets. IMO it should be unprintworthy by default, but accept a printworthy parameter in like manner to e.g. {{R from ambiguous term}} and {{R from incomplete disambiguation}}. Narky Blert (talk) 12:07, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Merge discussion[edit]

This merge discussion may be of interest to the members of this project. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:23, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Webley Revolver FAR[edit]

I have nominated Webley Revolver for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. GamerPro64 17:00, 29 October 2020 (UTC)